Incogni vs DeleteMe podcast advertising
A neutral comparison of where and how AdReads detected these advertisers across podcast episodes published from Jul 4, 2026 through Aug 2, 2026.
What the data says
From Jul 4, 2026 through Aug 2, 2026, AdReads detected 29 reads for Incogni across 11 shows, compared with 26 reads for DeleteMe across 15 shows. Incogni led on detected reads; DeleteMe led on distinct shows. The median observed ad length was 1m 3s for Incogni and 1m 4s for DeleteMe. These observations describe detected activity, not spend, reach, market share, or performance.
At a glance
Detected activity, not estimated spend, impressions, reach, or performance.
Where they advertise
Shared and exclusive podcast footprints, followed by primary categories counted once per distinct show.
Most active shows
Shared shows first, then each advertiser's largest exclusive placements.
Podcast category mix
Share of distinct shows, so frequent episodes from one podcast do not dominate.
How the ads run
Placement may be inferred from episode timing when the source record is unclassified. Unknown observations remain in coverage disclosures.
Placement
Read type
Primary objective
Offer strategy
Detected offer language, promo codes, and landing URLs. These are observable execution signals, not proof of campaign performance.
Incogni
86% with offer signalDeleteMe
100% with offer signalMethod and rivalry evidence
The report uses quality-qualified public reads attached to active sponsors, grouped through reviewed sponsor-slug families. Episodes are included by publication date in the latest complete rolling 30-day UTC window.
A distribution appears only with at least 20 classified observations and 80% coverage. Objective shares exclude unknown values; all other coverage is shown alongside the chart.
Both sell subscription services that remove personal information from data brokers.
Incogni vs DeleteMe